Atlanta
404-760-3800
2600 One Atlanta Plaza
950 E Paces Ferry Rd NE
Atlanta, GA 30326
Boston
617-859-2718
25th Floor, Prudential Tower
800 Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02199
Los Angeles
310-552-0130
Suite 3400
2049 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Minneapolis
612-349-8435
2800 LaSalle Plaza
800 LaSalle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Naples
239-213-1962
Suite 201
711 5th Avenue South
Naples, FL 34102
May 2007 - Posts
Microsoft Corporation v. AT&T Corporation
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Microsoft Corporation v. AT & T Corporation, one question predominates-"What Will Congress Do?" Why? Because the Microsoft Court explicitly left to Congress the task of protecting certain U.S. patent rights in light of the realities of current software distribution. Specifically, Microsoft addressed the applicability of 34 U.S.C § 271(f) to...
Read More...
MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. and KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
Combined, the decisions MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. and KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. may very well become the catalysts for a patent litigation explosion. Who will drive this next wave? Licensees seeking either an escape from their contracts and/or a downward renegotiation of their royalty rates. MedImmune provides the vehicle, and KSR provides the fuel. Under MedImmune, licensees...
Read More...
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
Patent law has undergone yet another revision and, once again, the change wrought comes potentially at the patent holder's expense. The latest salvo comes from the Supreme Court's decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. In KSR, the Supreme Court effectively diluted the prevailing test for obviousness in favor of an arguably less stringent, more subjective standard. In KSR, the patent...
Read More...
SanDisk Corp v. STMicroElectronics, Inc.
What's a patent holder to do? First, in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, the Supreme Court allows declaratory judgment (DJ) actions by patent licensees in good standing, thereby significantly lowering the ante for such litigation. Now, in SanDisk Corp v. STMicroElectronics, Inc. , the Federal Circuit has ushered in another patent law sea-change. At stake this time? The rules of the dance for patent...
Read More...
More Posts