Patent Litigation Updates

May 2008 - Posts

Bone Appetit!

Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp.

In Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp , the Federal Circuit dishes up a tasty decision on claim preclusion that certainly shouldn't ruin a patent holder's appetite for further litigation. Acumed makes clear that a patent holder's claims against an infringer for multiple versions of a product do not need to be brought in a single serving unless the allegedly infringing devices are "essentially...

Read More...

On the Rocks

LiteCubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc.

We'll give it to you neat. LiteCubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc . holds that section 271 of the patent statute does not contain that requirement for the federal courts' subject matter jurisdiction. Rather, section 271 states a necessary element of a claim for patent infringement. According to the Federal Circuit's top shelf opinion, a complaint which sufficiently pleads a cause...

Read More...

More Posts

Contact Us

Atlanta

A. James Anderson
404-760-3800
950 E Paces Ferry Rd NE
2600 One Atlanta Plaza
Atlanta, GA 30326

Boston

Anthony Froio
617-859-2718
800 Boylston Street
25th Floor, Prudential Tower
Boston, MA 02199

Los Angeles

Roman Silberfeld
310-552-0130
2049 Century Park East
Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Minneapolis

Ron Schutz
612-349-8435
800 LaSalle Avenue
2800 LaSalle Plaza
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Naples

Michael Volpe
239-213-1962
711 5th Avenue South
Suite 201
Naples, FL 34102

New York

David Leichtman
212-980-7401
499 Park Avenue
Suite 1200
New York, NY 10022